lframerica.com Blog

April 4, 2008

Houston-Area Woman Admits To Forced Labor Of Worker

http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/houston_85630___article.html/area_forced.html 

April 3, 2008

HOUSTON (AP) - A Sugar Land woman is going to prison and must pay back earnings to a domestic employee who received only $320 for several years of work.

A federal judge in Houston on Thursday sentenced 43-year-old Rozina Mohd Ali to one year and one day in prison, plus ordered nearly $73,000 in restitution.

Ali pleaded guilty to forced labor-related charges involving a woman from Indonesia.

Prosecutors say Ali had the Indonesian woman do her domestic work for practically no money at all, plus withheld the worker’s passport.

The worker, whose name was not released, fled the Ali household last August.

She had been employed by Ali, first in Malaysia, since August 2002 and was in the U.S. on a temporary visitor’s visa.

Ali has been in federal custody without bond.

April 1, 2008

Arizona Guest-Worker Program Hits Snag

http://www.yumasun.com/news/worker_40732___article.html/guest_program.html

Phoenix - Efforts to enact the first-ever state-run guest worker program hit a snag Monday over the question of which industries should be able to benefit.

Rep. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, said he is willing to back legislation by two Southeast Arizona legislators to allow foreign nationals to come into the state to fill certain jobs. Pearce also said that Sen. Marsha Arzberger, D-Willcox and Rep. Bill Konopnicki, R-Safford, have included some safeguards to prevent these temporary workers from becoming permanent U.S. residents or getting taxpayer-subsidized services.

But Pearce said unless two provisions are changed he will lead the charge to kill the plan.

Pearce’s opposition could prove fatal: He not only is the author of the state’s new employer sanctions law but has been able to marshal votes in the Republican-controlled Legislature to gain approval for various other immigration and border security measures.

Arzberger and Konopnicki filed a new version of their measure Monday in hopes of finding a politically acceptable state solution to what they say is a shortage of workers in certain industries. Efforts to expand existing federal work visas programs have gone nowhere in Congress.

The main hang-up, though, is how broad to make the plan. Pearce wants the program limited to agriculture. He said that is the area of the economy most in need of foreigners.

Arzberger, the Senate minority leader, said that restriction is unacceptable. She said there are other industries that are unable to fill certain jobs with legal U.S. workers. “We’ve got small businesses that are in danger of leaving the state,” she said. “We’ve got other industries that need these workers.”

“It’s just not true,” Pearce responded. He said if U.S. companies “pay the right wages they will get the right workers.”

Pearce said he believes farmers have made a showing they are unable to get workers in a timely fashion to harvest their perishable products and cannot wait.

“I can’t support importing workers when we’re having Americans laid off,” he said.

Pearce cited the construction industry in particular. The latest figures from the state Department of Commerce show another 1,900 jobs were lost between January and February. And the 203,900 people working in construction in February is 30,500 less than two years earlier.

He said the “free market economy” should be allowed to work, with the value of labor based on what it takes for companies to attract qualified people. Arzberger, however, said a company can’t qualify to import foreign workers solely based on an unwillingness to pay more.

“They have to say that, ‘We have taken these steps to locate local workforce and nobody has applied, nobody’s answered our ads,’ ” she said. And Arzberger said this isn’t designed to help the fast-food industry and others looking for low-skilled workers but wanting to keep their labor costs down.

She said the owner of a steel fabrication firm is offering $50 an hour for qualified workers “and he still can’t get them.”

Pearce also complained of what he sees as a loophole that could lead to more undocumented workers in this state and country. He noted the legislation allows the state Industrial Commission, which would issue ID cards to foreign workers, to revoke those cards if the person disappears.

That act, he said, is largely meaningless once someone is in this country and can simply walk away from a job and disappear. Pearce said employers who bring foreign workers into this country should be required to put up a bond.

A 2006 report by the Pew Hispanic Center found that at least one-third of the people in this country illegally actually got here legally. It concluded that somewhere between 4 million and 5.5 million current unauthorized migrants got legitimate visas to enter this country and simply never went home when the visas expired. That’s out of an estimated 11.5 to 12 million illegal immigrants now in the country.

Another 250,000 to 500,000 had border crossing cards - permits that allow them to come here legally for short visits to shop or work - but also chose to stay indefinitely. By contrast, anywhere from 6 million to 7 million entered illegally, many through the Arizona desert, and successfully evaded the Border Patrol, the report says.

Even if the measure is approved it may never take effect. Arzberger acknowledged that only the U.S. Department of Homeland Security can decide who to admit to the country and whether to honor any temporary worker ID cards issued by the state. She said there have been some preliminary discussions with the federal agency.

Russ Knocke, press aide to Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, said he could not comment specifically on the Arizona proposal. But he said the fact Arizona is pushing ahead with its own plan shows the need for Congress to approve a comprehensive immigration reform proposal, one that also deals with the labor needs of U.S. companies.

“Absent that reform, there’s still going to be a heavy burden on our frontline personnel,” Knocke said. He said the current situation results in a “tremendous economic pull for illegal workers and a push back from criminal groups as they feel the squeeze from tighter enforcement.”

March 29, 2008

On Path To Citizenship, First Step Can Be Hardest

 http://www.yumasun.com/articles/rios_21118___article.html/people_permanent.html

By Jeffery Gautreaux, Sun Staff Writer

A Foothills man who helps hundreds of people every year become U.S. citizens says the biggest roadblocks people face are becoming permanent residents in this country and finding the strength to continue through the process.

Marci Rios, a Yuma insurance agent and The Sun’s 2005 Yuma County Citizen of the Year, became a U.S. citizen at age 18 and has donated his time and money to help others to do the same. The biggest roadblock is the fear, he said.

A lot of times people don’t go to the interview.

In the past, Rios said it would take four to five years for him to help someone receive their citizenship, and, as a result, they would often lose the emotion they initially felt. Now, it may take only a year - sometimes even less.

For someone with a clean record who will be a benefit to the country, the obstacles are not in passing the citizenship, but in becoming a permanent resident in the first place. People have been waiting for the last 10 years to get a permanent resident card, Rios said. Not just from Mexico, but from all over the world. The government is processing the applications for permanent residency from back like in 1997.

Because of the backlog, Rios does not want to see a path to citizenship for illegal aliens in any comprehensive immigration reform bill passed by Congress. He said no matter what happens, illegal aliens should have to go to the back of the line behind those who are following the process.

I would like to see some type of guest worker program in place, he said. That’s how I came here. My parents were part of the Bracero program.

For those who have established permanent residency in the U.S. for five years or more, Rios has the experience to guide them through the process to be naturalized.

First, they fill out a 10-page questionnaire about their background, pay a $400 fee and send in two photo identifications. Rios said the questions cover all kinds of topics: work history, family history and criminal record.

During the process, Rios said honesty is the best policy. I have seen applications denied by people lying about crossing a port of entry saying they are a citizen, Rios said. They say, I forgot my card, but I speak such good English that I was able to get through.’ They deny (the application) because they are lying to the federal government.
Rios said the government does an extensive background check and will find any prior arrests or convictions. About four to five months later, the oral interview is held. It includes a character assessment and questions about U.S. history.

Candidates must be able to write, read and speak English. Rios said people should try to answer all questions in English as best they can, even if they are not fluent. Starting next year, it will probably be harder, he said. It will be more of a written test. Right now, it’s verbal.

If a candidate passes everything, they will be scheduled for a naturalization ceremony, where they will take the oath and become an
American citizen.

March 27, 2008

Senate To Debate Lifting Ban On HIV-Positive Visitors to U.S.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/24/MNOCVP3C6.DTL

Despite contributing billions to the international battle against AIDS, the United States remains one of only 13 nations - including Iraq, Qatar and Armenia - to ban HIV-positive foreign visitors and immigrants.

Public health officials and advocates are calling on the U.S. government to lift the long-standing travel ban for foreigners with HIV, calling it draconian and politically motivated.

Congress appears to be listening. The Senate is expected to debate the ban this month as part of President Bush’s popular, global AIDS relief package.

The United States has faced harsh criticism internationally for having one of the most restrictive immigration policies for HIV-positive foreigners, particularly in comparison with other Western nations. Under U.S. law, foreigners with HIV are not permitted to immigrate to the United States, or even visit temporarily, unless they qualify for narrowly defined waivers.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed an amendment this month to the $50 billion AIDS funding bill that would mark the first step toward lifting the ban, which dates to 1987. Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Oakland, has sponsored a House version of the amendment.

Some public health and human rights advocates said the ban’s repeal is overdue.

“There is no scientific basis whatsoever for the travel ban, and there never has been,” said Dr. Mark Kline, head of retrovirology at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and director of the school’s AIDS International Training and Research Program. “It was a political decision.”

The ban has damaged the country’s reputation, critics say. It prompted a boycott by prominent AIDS advocacy and research groups, which have not held a major international conference in the United States since the early 1990s.

“It’s kind of embarrassing when we’re one of only 13 countries in the world that doesn’t allow visitors to come who are HIV-positive,” said John Nechman, a Houston immigration lawyer who specializes in immigration cases involving HIV-positive clients. “And we’re talking about Sudan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia - some pretty despotic areas of the world.”

Under federal law, the U.S. secretary of Health and Human Services has the discretion to determine what constitutes a “communicable diseases of public health significance” that would bar a noncitizen from entering the United States. The federal health agency now lists eight diseases - including HIV, tuberculosis, leprosy and gonorrhea - as basis for denying admission as a tourist or immigrant.

The federal health agency added HIV/AIDS to the list in 1987, prompting backlash from the international AIDS community. In 1991, health agency officials proposed lifting the ban on people with HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases, which led to protests by conservatives.

In 1993, Congress took discretion over AIDS admissions away from health agency officials, passing legislation that specifically banned people with HIV under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

According to U.S. State Department statistics, 938 immigration applicants were denied admission to the United States in 2007 because they had a communicable disease. However, of those applicants, 478 were later allowed entry after receiving waivers from the federal government. State Department spokesman Steven Royster said there was no breakdown of applicants’ diseases available.

The United States does not require HIV tests for all foreign visitors - only for people planning to immigrate permanently. However, short-term visitors are asked in the visa application process if they have a communicable disease.

Martin Rooney, a 47-year-old HIV-positive activist from Surrey, British Columbia, was turned away Nov. 17 at the Peace Arch port of entry on the northern border with Canada. At the port, a U.S. Customs and Border Protection inspector saw Rooney’s Canadian medical disability card, he said, leading to questions about his HIV status.

Rooney said he was detained, fingerprinted and checked against an FBI database before being told to return to Canada and apply for an HIV waiver. He has not been back to the United States since.

“This has been a major, major inconvenience,” he said. “I absolutely cannot do a damn thing in the U.S. now.”

Helen Kennedy, executive director of Egale Canada, which advocates for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Canadians, said the HIV travel ban is harmful.

“I know of a lot of people who have been turned away because they are HIV-positive,” she said. “It encourages us to go further in the closet. It makes people lie on their forms, and that is not something we want to do. I think it’s time - beyond time, actually, to have the ban lifted.

Bans on HIV travelers

The United States is one of 13 countries with a law that bans travel and immigration for people with HIV. The others:

– Armenia

– Brunei

– China (although the country has proposed lifting its ban)

– Iraq

– Qatar

– South Korea

– Libya

– Moldova

– Oman

– Russian Federation

– Saudi Arabia

– Sudan

Source: Houston Chronicle

March 25, 2008

HR 5630 Would Double Number of H-1B Visas.

Filed under: Uncategorized, Politics, Government, Bills, Legal Immigration, United States News — Administrator @ 9:20 pm

HR 5630, also known as the “Innovation Employment Act,” would increase the cap in H-1B visas from 65,000 a year currently to 130,000 a year.  There also would be included no limit on the number of H-1B visas for foreigners who came as graduate students in technical fields to U.S. colleges.  If one year prior the 130,000 cap is reached, this legislation would also allow for an additional increase to the H-1B cap to 180,000 from 2010 to 2015.

March 15, 2008

Helping Immigrants Live The Dream Of Living Off The Land

It is not discussed if this also applies to illegal immigrants.  While it is wonderful how many immigrants do wish to live off the land, one has to also realize that many American’s would love a chance at these loans and to live off the land as well.  Here is hoping they are not shorting one to support the other. 

March 4, 2008

Star Tribune 

Morning after morning, in a greenhouse near Hastings, a handful of Hmong farmers plant seeds and tend to sprouts of basil, lemongrass, flowers and other produce that they’ll sell at farmers’ markets this spring.

Just off Hwy. 55, this Hmong-owned farm is nestled in the metro area, just like a growing number of immigrants’ small-scale farms and garden plots throughout the state.

The immigrant farmers make up nearly half of the vendors in the farmers’ markets that are popping up in community after community to serve consumers who want connections to the source of their food.

They are the kind of small-scale farmers that organizers of an immigrant-farmer training conference hope to attract Friday and Saturday.

These farmers face many challenges — the least of which is a command of the English language adequate enough to understand the rules and regulations that govern the growing of food and flowers. They need technical assistance and information on subjects ranging from marketing to microbes.

The conference will be offered in six languages for at least 140 farmers, including those of Hmong, Laotian, Cambodian, Vietnamese, Burmese, Somali, Ethiopian and Latino origins. Another 30 or so people from government and nonprofit agencies also are to attend the conference near Como Park in St. Paul. Registration has closed.

“This is the only significant conference that is targeting immigrant farmers,” said Glen Hill, executive director of the Minnesota Food Association, a co-sponsor of the event. “There are a lot of conferences about immigrants and refugees, and a lot about sustainable farming, but this is the first and only that addresses immigrant farming and their special needs and interests.”

A growing subset in farming

Nobody knows the exact number of immigrant and minority farmers in the state, which is one of the top resettlement centers for Asian and East African refugees. The most recent U.S. agricultural census showed that the number of minority and Hispanic farmers in the state nearly tripled from 356 in 1997 to about 1,000 in 2002.

Many say the actual count is far greater.

An estimated 200 to 300 of those 1,000 or so farmers are Hmong, said Nigatu Tadesse, outreach coordinator for Minnesota Farm Service Agency. Asian farmers overall, he said, now represent 40 to 50 percent of the vendors at farmers’ markets in Minneapolis and St. Paul.

“It’s a very diverse group of farmers in all ways, especially in the metro area culturally because you see a lot of immigrant farmers who are either Hmong or Somali,” said Paul Hugunin of the state Agriculture Department’s Minnesota Grown Program.

Tadesse, an organizer of the conference, said it will help farmers form relationships with one another so that they can get information from more experienced sources they trust. It’s also strengthening partnerships among organizations such as the Association for the Advance of Hmong Women in Minnesota, the Minnesota Food Association and University of Minnesota extension, he said.

Technical training

These agencies and others have united for this third-annual conference, the biggest yet. It will cover marketing, land access, organic certification, and production of safe and healthy food.

“It’s important they receive technical assistance and training to help them with their farm business,” said Ly Vang of the Association for the Advancement of Hmong Women in Minnesota. “They need to understand agriculture rules and regulations.”

Many immigrants find agriculture in the United States daunting, with many laws and requirements, Vang said. “It’s like a big wall they never get through,” she said.

Perhaps the biggest challenge for immigrant farmers is getting access to land through buying or leasing. One session will help farmers understand the expectations of landowners who are willing to lease their land for garden plots.

“Often these groups don’t come together but when they do, there sometimes are communication problems,” Hill said.

On Saturday, the immigrants will tour two Dakota County farms. One is owned by Der and Nikk Thao, who raise vegetables and flowers near Northfield. They were the first immigrant farmers in Minnesota to secure a federal Farm Service Agency loan, which they used to buy their 68-acre farm. They now rent land to other Hmong farmers.

Tadesse said the couple represent what many immigrant farmers hope to achieve.

“They are really successful people,” Tadesse said. “They have achieved the American dream. They have overcome any challenges they faced. We’d like other people to follow their example, to achieve dreams.”

Joy Powell • 952-882-9017

March 12, 2008

S.C. Second State To Require Voters Citizenship Proof? It Could Happen.

March 10, 2008

In what seems a logical option. South Carolina is considering a house bill that would require anyone registering to vote to show a passport, birth certificate or other naturalization documents.

This bill would protect elections by ensuring illegal immigrants or other noncitizens are unable to cast ballots. This is a good thing, yet there are some who feel it is a hassle for people who might vote for democrats.  A pointless argument really as people will vote for whomever they wish to vote for, but having someone vote who isn’t a citizen and who is in this country illegally makes no logical sense and is a breach to the country security.

This bill would apply only to those who are registering to vote and not to voters already on the rolls, and would not affect anyone after they already have registered.   What is failed to be realized by those opposing and some considering this bill is that it already is a law in this country that you must be a U.S. citizen to vote at all.

The first state to pass a similar law was Arizona in 2004.

Guest Workers Sue Gulf Coast Company That Imported Them

March 11, 2008

New York Times

Workers Sue Gulf Coast Company That Imported Them

by Adam Nossiter

NEW ORLEANS — A group of 500 foreign welders and pipefitters brought in to work at Gulf Coast oil rig yards after Hurricane Katrina said Monday that they had sued their employer, claiming they were lured with false promises of permanent-resident status, forced to live in inhumane conditions and then threatened when they protested.

The workers were recruited in India and the United Arab Emirates and brought in late 2006 and early 2007 under the government’s temporary guest worker program. They worked at Signal International, an oil-rig repair and construction company with yards in Pascagoula, Miss., about 85 miles east of here, and in Orange, Tex., about 100 miles east of Houston.

The company said it had brought them in to supplement a labor force depleted by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

At a rally here Monday, workers and their lawyers said they had given up life savings, sold family jewelry and paid up to $20,000 in immigration and travel fees after being assured that the company would help them to become permanent residents of the United States.

In a statement, the company called the workers’ charges “baseless and unfounded” and said it had spent “over $7 million constructing state-of-the-art housing complexes” for the workers. The company said that the “vast majority of the workers” recruited had been satisfied with their conditions and that the workers were being paid “in excess” of prevailing rates and in full compliance with the law.

Workers and their advocates disputed those assertions. Ignorant of American immigration law, advocates said, the workers were unaware that they had been brought in only temporarily.

“They didn’t know they were guest workers,” said Stephen Boykewich of the New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice. “They thought they were getting permanent status.”

The green cards enabling residency never materialized, according to the lawsuit, and the workers were forced to live in overcrowded guarded “bunkhouses” at Signal International, with inadequate toilets and unhygienic kitchens that frequently made them ill.

The class-action lawsuit was filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center of Montgomery, Ala., among other groups.

The workers’ assertions are the latest in a series of complaints about exploitation of foreign laborers on the Gulf Coast after Hurricane Katrina.

Previous complaints have involved Hispanic hotel and construction workers and farm laborers and have centered on low pay and harsh working conditions.

In the summer of 2006, Hispanic hotel workers sued a prominent New Orleans developer over inadequate pay, and last month, fruit pickers walked off the job in a parish north of here over exploitative conditions.

The Southern Poverty Law Center has also sued on behalf of immigrant workers involved in the reconstruction and cleanup of New Orleans after the storm. It maintains that immigrants brought in under the guest worker program are “systematically exploited and abused,” all over the country.

March 11, 2008

FAIR REPORT: SPLC Manipulates Crime Data and Terminology in Last-Ditch Attempt to Stop The Immigration Debate

This is a wonderful article that must be read and passed along.  It speaks a lot of truth about what the SPLC has become, and how far they have fallen from what they could have been. 

FAIR

March 10, 2008

(Washington DC) Today the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) issued a misleading release announcing a significant increase in the number of hate groups and hate crimes over the last few years. The release then suggests that our national debate over immigration reform has fueled the increase in both. Offering no criteria as to what constitutes a hate group, manipulating the data for self-serving purposes, and then making broad, unsubstantiated conclusions, this latest release from the SPLC constitutes one of its most reckless charges to date. It is calculated to be inflammatory, tarnish the reputation of leading immigration reform groups, and shut down meaningful public policy debate about immigration reform.

When examined responsibly, the FBI hate crime data show a dramatically different story than the one the SPLC portrays. First, in order to suggest an artificially large increase in the raw number of hate crimes, the SPLC selects 2003 as its base year, one of lowest years on record for hate crimes against Hispanics. If one compares the number of hate crimes between 1995 (the earliest report available on the FBI’s website) and 2006 (the most recent statistical year available), one would see that the number of hate crimes has increased only 17 percent.

But even this is not the whole story. The SPLC conveniently forgets to index the raw hate crime data with the population, a step always taken by the FBI to more accurately depict an increase or decrease in crime. Thus, when one indexes a 17 percent increase in hate crimes against Hispanics with a 67 percent increase in the Hispanic population between 1995 and 2006, it becomes clear that the rate of hate crimes against Hispanics has in fact dropped dramatically - by about 40 percent.

This reduction in the rate of hate crimes against Hispanics is even more apparent when one considers that the number of law enforcement agencies that participate in the FBI’s hate crime data collection program increased 33 percent between 1995 and 2006. Between 2003 and 2006 alone, the number of law enforcement agencies participating in the FBI’s hate crime data collection program increased by over 700.

Finally, the SPLC claims that there has been substantial growth in the number of “hate groups” since 2000. However, the SPLC provides no definition of a “hate group” and offers no objective criteria that it uses to classify organizations as such. The SPLC appears to think that it can stick this label onto any organization it wishes, including long-standing, highly-regarded immigration reform organizations such as the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) without being challenged as to its motivations or methodology. FAIR is confident the media and the American people will see through the SPLC’s deceitful tactics.

“There is no level of hate crime that is acceptable — period,” says Dan Stein, President of FAIR. “However, the SPLC’s calculated abuse of the term ‘hate group’ and manipulation of hate crime data for self-serving political interests is an affront to hate crime victims and those who advocate on their behalf. The SPLC manipulates data to reach deceitful conclusions, tosses the term ‘hate group’ at highly-respected organizations like FAIR, and then mixes the two in an attempt to stop our national debate over immigration reform. But this is consistent with the SPLC’s growing practice of making allegations with no factual basis, no criteria and sadly, no one challenging their increasing habit of playing fast and loose with the facts. Unfortunately, it is the American people who suffer most through this irresponsible behavior.”

ABOUT FAIR

Headquartered on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., FAIR is the largest, oldest and most respected immigration reform group in America. With over 250,000 members, FAIR advocates for non-discriminatory immigration polices that protect American jobs, wages, the environment, and national security. As a bipartisan organization free from special interest influence, FAIR is regularly sought by Congress and the media for its objective analysis and for its fair, practical and effective policy solutions.

Hispanic Illegal Alien Exodus Proof of a Bad Marriage Partnership

In much the same way that a bad marriage is not healthy if one partner is in it for what they can get out of it, and the other is co-dependent on that partner. Illegal immigration is unhealthy for the co-dependent country involved.

Almost daily we hear how our crashing economy is causing an exodus of illegals returning to their homelands when the work, money, and handouts runs out. Many of these are represented in the media as hardship stories built to display the “poor undocumented worker”, “poor businesses”, and in some cases “poor community” who are being affected by the loss. While no one can dispute the effect this loss has on those elements, they are in essence, no different then those who are co-dependent marriage partners who suddenly find themselves struggling to learn to survive.

What needs to be understood, and understood firmly, is that illegal immigrants are not here “for better or for worse”. They will not hang around when this country struggles. They will not hang around if the country falls. Their loyalty is not to this country at all and they will return home to the place their loyalty lies, or move on to another country that has what they desire. In this case money, work, and someone to take care of them.

American citizens and many legal immigrants have a deep loyalty to the United States. No matter how hard it gets in the nation, they will hold on, they will struggle through, and they will work to improve the situation of the home they love unconditionally. “For better or for worse” is not even a thought for them, it’s a way of life.

Just as one would not support a loved on, or friend in an unhealthy relationship. America needs to not support this unhealthy relationship that’s been created by illegal immigrants and their advocates. Americans need to support and advocate for healthy relationships with Citizens and legal immigrants who had a deep unseated love for this country. Who will stick with her through thick and thin, no matter how thin it gets. It is that, and that alone that makes for a healthy relationship and a healthy nation.
As for the “woe is me” tales, well just like the co-dependent partner learns to live again. These co-dependent individuals, businesses, and communities will also learn to live again. In many cases they will learn to be stronger, stabler, and healthier then before when they were in the unhealthy relationship. In some cases they might not ever break the bonds of co-dependency but above all they will learn what the signs of co-dependency are and be able to advocate against it, while helping awake other co-dependents to be able to survive the “life without” too.

Hispanic exodus is under way
Workers leave Lee as jobs disappear
The News Press
March 9, 2008

In this case, cold, hard statistics don’t tell the story.

“I am not aware of anyone who would track that locally,” said Glen Solier, business development specialist for the Lee County Department of Economic Development.

“Those people are off the grid. Undocumented,” said Susanna Patterson, economic analyst for the Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation.

But the oh-so-human snapshots of everyday living are revealing.

Like a weekend soccer league down from 32 teams to 25 because more than 100 players have had to leave.

Or a church that has cut two Sunday services to one because about 200 former members have returned to their homeland.

Or the western-wear clothier who gave up one of his three shopping center units and said business is off by 40 percent because customers are gone.

Put these and other pictures together and the collage tells the story of Hispanics who are leaving Southwest Florida to find work or to return to the support of their families back home.

“There is a loss in the number of Hispanics in our communities,” said Robert Selle, director of the Amigos Center, which aids Hispanics with immigration issues and offers other services in Lee County. “The underlying reason is economic; the same reason they came here in the first place.”

Population drain

The loss comes from a good portion of Lee County’s population. The U.S. Census Bureau listed the county’s Hispanic population at more than 90,000 - about 16 percent of Lee’s 571,000 population - in 2006.

What the statistics further show is that work is gone. Unemployment in the Fort Myers-Cape Coral region has risen this past year, from 2.7 percent to 6.3 percent.

Many of the lost jobs are in construction, which has been put on hold as the sluggish market struggles with a glut of unsold houses.

Because many Hispanic construction workers are believed to be illegal immigrants, because construction and agricultural workers are a mobile population anyway, because many are single with families back in their native lands, and because their leaving was often spur-of-the-moment, no governmental or social service agency is keeping accurate records of this exodus.

Lee County School District reported a loss of Hispanics in all grades totaling 388 pupils through January of this school year - this after growing by almost 3,000 Hispanic students a year earlier.

But the white student population dropped as well. The big difference was while dropout rates tend to increase as the year goes on in the upper grades, the Hispanic population was the only one also to lose ground in the kindergarten through fifth-grade range. It fell by 87 pupils - an indication their families moved from the district, according to Michael Smith, director of planning, growth and school capacity.

“Many workers in the construction industry and related industry are leaving the area and following the money,” said Barbara Hartman, spokeswoman for the state’s Career and Service Center in Fort Myers. “It seems to be an increasing number of people who are temporarily relocating. I wish we did track that.”

Hartman said she knows people are leaving because they tell counselors when they come in seeking work, saying they need the higher construction industry wages, which begin at $10 to $11 an hour for the most unskilled, to maintain their standard of living……..

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress