lframerica.com Blog

March 11, 2008

GOP Moves To Force Immigration Enforcement Vote

Good for the GOP, about time we see where these elected officials loyalties lie. If to America and the American people or Big Business, Mexico and illegal aliens.  What perfect timing to bring this up, so the American people know who to vote for in the upcoming election, their current leaders or brand new ones who will listen to their voters.

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS, Associated Press Writer Mon Mar 10, 7:30 PM ET

WASHINGTON - House Republicans are trying to force action on a Democratic-written immigration enforcement measure, the latest GOP attempt to elevate the volatile issue into an election-year wedge.

Republican leaders hope that by pushing the bill — endorsed by 48 centrist Democrats and 94 Republicans — they can drive Democrats into a politically painful choice: Backing a tough immigration measure that could alienate their base, including Hispanic voters, or being painted as soft on border security in conservative-leaning districts.

The plan is fraught with political risks for both parties. A full-blown immigration debate could call attention to Republicans’ divisions at a time when their expected presidential nominee, Sen. John McCain, is fighting to gain the trust of the GOP base.

McCain, R-Ariz., played a prominent role in failed legislative efforts to grant some of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants already here a path to legal status, which conservatives deride as “amnesty.” He now says he would consider such a plan only after the borders have been fortified.

House Republicans are eyeing a bill by Rep. Heath Shuler, D-N.C., that would do just that, as well as mandate that employers verify that their workers are in the U.S. legally.

Leaders are expected as early as Tuesday to use a parliamentary tactic that would eventually force a vote on the measure if 218 lawmakers — a majority of the House — demand it. Republicans are pressuring Democratic backers of the measure — including several first-termers and dozens from swing districts, all facing tough re-election fights — to defy their leaders and sign the petition.

“Lots of Republicans and lots of Democrats would like to see something done,” Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., the No. 2 whip, said Friday.

The move would be a rebuke to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who opposes the Shuler bill unless it’s paired with measures to allow undocumented workers a chance at legal status and allow legal immigrants to bring more family members to the United States. Democratic leaders have been working behind the scenes to craft an alternative that could dissuade their more conservative members who back Shuler’s bill from joining the GOP effort to press forward on it.

They are considering pairing a widely popular measure by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., to allow more seasonal workers to come to the United States under so-called H-2B visas with proposals aimed at speeding the process of granting immigrants’ spouses and minor children visas to join their parents in the U.S., among others. Also under discussion is a bill that would allow nonresident immigrants serving in the military to become citizens.

It’s not clear whether Republicans can gather enough support for a vote on the bipartisan enforcement bill, which couldn’t take place until April at the earliest. GOP leaders relish the idea of calling attention to Democrats’ rifts on the issue in advance of Congress’ 14-day Easter recess starting next week. They plan to blast Democrats who have endorsed the legislation but not signed onto the effort to force a vote on it.

“I think it makes it harder for the majority to do nothing,” Rep. Adam Putnam, R-Fla, said of the idea last week. “On a district-by-district basis, there will be places where this is an important issue.”

Shuler has said he would sign the petition. He’s one of several conservative-leaning freshman lawmakers whose elections in Republican or swing districts gave Democrats control of the House in 2006, handing Pelosi the speaker’s gavel. He won his race amid Republican efforts to tie him to Pelosi, including an ad that accused him of plotting with Democrats “to take over Congress with the votes of illegal immigrants.”

“He does support the (legislation) and would like to see an up-or-down vote,” said Andrew Whalen, Shuler’s spokesman. “He would prefer that it didn’t become a political issue.”

Some Democrats said they are eager to debate the legislation.

“It’s a very big issue. I hear a lot about it, and that’s why I want to bring it to the floor,” said Rep. Jason Altmire, R-Pa., another first-termer who is co-sponsoring the bill. “We need to address it. Let’s just bring it all to the floor and see what wins.”

Even some Democrats who back Shuler’s bill bristle at the idea of joining Republicans to force a vote on it, voicing concern that they’re being used as political pawns.

“For their presidential candidate to have supported amnesty and for them to be pulling a stunt like this is pure politics,” said Rep. Lincoln Davis, D-Tenn., a co-sponsor of Shuler’s bill.

In the Senate, a group of mostly conservative Republicans last week unveiled a package of legislation to crack down on illegal immigration and secure the border. They, too, said they would use procedural tactics to get Democrats on the record on the volatile immigration issue.

Democrats are trying to turn the tables, hoping that Republicans’ efforts to push get-tough immigration measures will hurt McCain with Hispanic voters and independents, two groups that have supported him in the past.

In a letter to McCain last week, Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., called on the Arizonan to reject the GOP leaders’ plans, calling them “draconian and divisive.”

“Such a rejection will let this nation’s 44 million Latinos know that demonizing them for political purposes will not be tolerated and that the more hateful rhetoric in the immigration debate has no place in our country’s civic discourse,” Menendez wrote.

Hispanic Illegal Alien Exodus Proof of a Bad Marriage Partnership

In much the same way that a bad marriage is not healthy if one partner is in it for what they can get out of it, and the other is co-dependent on that partner. Illegal immigration is unhealthy for the co-dependent country involved.

Almost daily we hear how our crashing economy is causing an exodus of illegals returning to their homelands when the work, money, and handouts runs out. Many of these are represented in the media as hardship stories built to display the “poor undocumented worker”, “poor businesses”, and in some cases “poor community” who are being affected by the loss. While no one can dispute the effect this loss has on those elements, they are in essence, no different then those who are co-dependent marriage partners who suddenly find themselves struggling to learn to survive.

What needs to be understood, and understood firmly, is that illegal immigrants are not here “for better or for worse”. They will not hang around when this country struggles. They will not hang around if the country falls. Their loyalty is not to this country at all and they will return home to the place their loyalty lies, or move on to another country that has what they desire. In this case money, work, and someone to take care of them.

American citizens and many legal immigrants have a deep loyalty to the United States. No matter how hard it gets in the nation, they will hold on, they will struggle through, and they will work to improve the situation of the home they love unconditionally. “For better or for worse” is not even a thought for them, it’s a way of life.

Just as one would not support a loved on, or friend in an unhealthy relationship. America needs to not support this unhealthy relationship that’s been created by illegal immigrants and their advocates. Americans need to support and advocate for healthy relationships with Citizens and legal immigrants who had a deep unseated love for this country. Who will stick with her through thick and thin, no matter how thin it gets. It is that, and that alone that makes for a healthy relationship and a healthy nation.
As for the “woe is me” tales, well just like the co-dependent partner learns to live again. These co-dependent individuals, businesses, and communities will also learn to live again. In many cases they will learn to be stronger, stabler, and healthier then before when they were in the unhealthy relationship. In some cases they might not ever break the bonds of co-dependency but above all they will learn what the signs of co-dependency are and be able to advocate against it, while helping awake other co-dependents to be able to survive the “life without” too.

Hispanic exodus is under way
Workers leave Lee as jobs disappear
The News Press
March 9, 2008

In this case, cold, hard statistics don’t tell the story.

“I am not aware of anyone who would track that locally,” said Glen Solier, business development specialist for the Lee County Department of Economic Development.

“Those people are off the grid. Undocumented,” said Susanna Patterson, economic analyst for the Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation.

But the oh-so-human snapshots of everyday living are revealing.

Like a weekend soccer league down from 32 teams to 25 because more than 100 players have had to leave.

Or a church that has cut two Sunday services to one because about 200 former members have returned to their homeland.

Or the western-wear clothier who gave up one of his three shopping center units and said business is off by 40 percent because customers are gone.

Put these and other pictures together and the collage tells the story of Hispanics who are leaving Southwest Florida to find work or to return to the support of their families back home.

“There is a loss in the number of Hispanics in our communities,” said Robert Selle, director of the Amigos Center, which aids Hispanics with immigration issues and offers other services in Lee County. “The underlying reason is economic; the same reason they came here in the first place.”

Population drain

The loss comes from a good portion of Lee County’s population. The U.S. Census Bureau listed the county’s Hispanic population at more than 90,000 - about 16 percent of Lee’s 571,000 population - in 2006.

What the statistics further show is that work is gone. Unemployment in the Fort Myers-Cape Coral region has risen this past year, from 2.7 percent to 6.3 percent.

Many of the lost jobs are in construction, which has been put on hold as the sluggish market struggles with a glut of unsold houses.

Because many Hispanic construction workers are believed to be illegal immigrants, because construction and agricultural workers are a mobile population anyway, because many are single with families back in their native lands, and because their leaving was often spur-of-the-moment, no governmental or social service agency is keeping accurate records of this exodus.

Lee County School District reported a loss of Hispanics in all grades totaling 388 pupils through January of this school year - this after growing by almost 3,000 Hispanic students a year earlier.

But the white student population dropped as well. The big difference was while dropout rates tend to increase as the year goes on in the upper grades, the Hispanic population was the only one also to lose ground in the kindergarten through fifth-grade range. It fell by 87 pupils - an indication their families moved from the district, according to Michael Smith, director of planning, growth and school capacity.

“Many workers in the construction industry and related industry are leaving the area and following the money,” said Barbara Hartman, spokeswoman for the state’s Career and Service Center in Fort Myers. “It seems to be an increasing number of people who are temporarily relocating. I wish we did track that.”

Hartman said she knows people are leaving because they tell counselors when they come in seeking work, saying they need the higher construction industry wages, which begin at $10 to $11 an hour for the most unskilled, to maintain their standard of living……..

February 24, 2008

With Such High Costs, Why Not Secure The Border?

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, Government, Mexico, Illegal Entry, United States News — Administrator @ 10:44 pm

We all know the true affects of illegal immigrants on American and American Citizens.  But it is not just the American people that are affected by the United States open border policies and failed immigration enforcement.  The costs of lives to those trying to get to this country is high, to high, and should prompt our Government and American’s to insist upon doing everything in it’s power to persuade those trying to cross the border illegally to remain at home.

Read the hard core facts IN THIS ARTICLE.  Send a copy to your Government representatives and let them know you insist upon them protecting illegal immigrants lives by deactivating the border magnet.

February 20, 2008

Illegal Immigrants from India Rise Alarmingly In US: Report

Radiff India Abroad

India may have taken giant strides in every possible sphere of life across the world, but there are things that come as real blot to its global image.  

Quoting a US Department of Homeland Security report, mercurynews reports that Indians are the fastest-growing group of illegal immigrants in the United States.

The report says there are 2,70,000 unauthorized Indians in the United States - a 125 percent jump since 2000, the largest percentage increase of any nation with more than 100,000 illegal immigrants in that country.

What continues to shock is that they are able to give accurate figures of how many illegal aliens are in this country, yet claim they are unable to find them to return them to their homelands  

The report says though the number of Indian immigrants is low when compared to people from Mexico, the Indian context is appalling as the illegal immigrants mostly consist of high-skilled workers. Illegal immigrants from other countries are mostly low-skilled workers. 

This combination of high-skilled illegal workers and low-skilled illegal workers end up forcing all American’s into  having to fight each other for middle-skilled jobs or deal with unemployment all together.

Mercurynews, in its report, also says if the trend continues India will only trail only Mexico, El Salvador and Guatemala in illegal immigration.

The report quoting experts says virtually all immigrants enter the US legally and then violate the visa terms, thus becomimg illegal immigrants.

“How do you get in? You come across the border, or you arrive here with a visa,” Lindsay Lowell, policy director for the Institute for the Study of International Migration at Georgetown University told Mercurynews.

“Indians aren’t going to be walking across the border like Mexicans,” he said.

There have been numerous reports of OTM’s (Other Than Mexican’s) crossing our Southern and Northern borders.  Some learning Spanish, and carrying mexican passports and documents.  

Federal officials calculated the number of illegal immigrants by using census estimates of the total number of immigrants from individual countries, compiling the total number of legal immigrants using federal immigration and naturalization records, and then subtracting the number of legal residents from the total immigrant population to determine the number of undocumented people, the report said.

Asked by Mercurynews about the number of illegal Indians in Silicon Valley, Banjit Singh, an Indian-born taxi driver, said, “Here, there is a little bit. But you go to another city or state, like Los Angeles or New York, there are many illegal people.”

Local immigration lawyers say that particularly among Indians, the ups and downs of Silicon Valley’s economy since 2001 are one reason why Indians have fallen out of legal status.

The problems with the ups and downs would be less an issue and reduce illegal aliens if companies made a motto and lived by it of “American’s first” 

“Most are bachelors; the way they get here is they have a job,” Gabriel Jack, a San Jose immigration lawyer, said of many of his Indian clients.

“They come here as professionals, most often in the H-1B program, and given the fluctuations of Silicon Valley, the business climate, these guys lose their jobs. They get laid off or they wager their hands on a start-up coming in,” Jack said.

“The problem with the H-1B program is, you can’t have any significant time between jobs” without falling out of legal status.

In most countries, if you loose your job you are returned to your home country.  Why is this policy not implemented in the United States? It was stated that the whole reason they came here is due to having a job, once that job goes they should be returned home until another hires them on a new H-1B.

Indians made up 44 percent of H-1B applicants in the 2005-06 fiscal year, five times the number from second-place China, the report says.

The report says another source is relatives from India who arrive for a visit on a tourist visa and never go home.

America is a very attractive country; everybody who comes here wants to stay,” said Shah Peerally, a Silicon Valley immigration lawyer. “I can tell you right now, there are nearly 1 billion people in India, of which maybe 800 million want to come here.”

The United States deported close to 500 Indians a year in recent years, another expert tells Mecurynews.

500 deported out of 270,000 currently here and how many more entering yearly?  It seems progress in fixing this situation is failing.  

“Unless Congress reforms the immigration system we are going to see this high-skilled, illegal workforce emerging,” said Frank D. Bean, director of the Immigration Research Center at the University of California-Irvine.

No, unless Congress finally agrees to enforce the current Federal Laws regarding illegal aliens, we will see this illegal trend continue.  But then I guess it’s easier to rebuild the house, rather then just tighten the loose screw in the door handle.

Lou Dobbs Radio

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, NAU, SPP, TTC, Environment, Communities, Schools, Food Threats, American Crimes, Drugs, Gangs, Biohazards/Toxins, Politics, Bills, Border Patrol, U.S. Security, Homeland Security, POW'S, Big Business, DUI/Vehicular Accident, Murder/Homocide, Rape, Violent Crime, Robbery/Theft/Vandalism, Health Threats, Diseases, Biohazards/Toxins, DUI, Murder/Homocide, Rape, Illegal Alien Crimes, Burgulary/Theft/Vandalism, Violent Crimes, Miscellaneous, Government, President, White House, Vice President, Congress, House of Rep., World News, Legal Immigration, ICE Raids, Employers, Arrests, Riots, Real ID Act, Costs, NAFTA/CAFTA/FTAA, National Threats, Terrorist Threats, Nuclear Threats, Democrats, Republicans, State & Local, Illegal Entry, Amnesty Bill, Texas, Houston, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Law Enforcement, Local, Hit and Run, Hit And Run, CrimeMarch, Child Molestation, Oklahoma, Drugs, Drugs, Virginia, New Jersey, Colorado, Connecticut, Deleware, D.C., Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Job Loss, Recalls, United States News, Nation Wide, Governors, Smuggling, Child Abuse, Child Abuse/Molestation, Government Crimes, Hate Crimes — Administrator @ 10:15 am

Lou Dobbs will not be silenced! Lou Dobbs 3 hour radio program via live satellite.

Launching March 3, 2008

Monday - Friday, 3-6pm ET.

LOU DOBBS RADIO 

February 19, 2008

Cheap Tomatoes!

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, Bills, Big Business, Government, Costs, Illegal Entry, Amnesty Bill — Administrator @ 2:50 am

DiggersRealm

The story below is brought to you from an English teacher and was written around the time of the amnesty push. Let us revisit how “cheap” tomatoes (or lettuce or grapes or substitute your favorite fruit or vegetable) are due to illegal aliens.

CHEAP TOMATOES

This should make everyone think, be you Democrat, Republican or
Independent or whatever.

From a California school teacher - - -

“As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of: I am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its student’s average lower socioeconomic and income levels.

Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell Gardens, Huntington Park, etc., where these students are protesting, are also Title 1 schools. Title 1 schools are on the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I’m not talking a glass of milk and roll — but a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more DO have cell phones. The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family watch their kids. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later, have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK)

I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less then 3 months who raised so much hell with the female teachers, calling them “Putas” (whores) and throwing things, that the teachers were in tears.

Free medical, free education, free food, day care etc., etc, etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements?

To those who want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE costs.

Higher insurance, medical facilities closing, higher medical costs, more crime, lower standards of education in our schools, overcrowding, new diseases etc., etc, etc. For me, I’ll pay more for tomatoes.

Americans! We need to wake up. The guest worker program will be a disaster because we won’t have the guts to enforce it. Does anyone in their right mind really think they will voluntarily leave and return?

It does, however, have everything to do with culture: A third-world culture that does not value education, that accepts children getting pregnant and dropping out of school by 15 and that refuses to assimilate, and an American culture that has become so weak and worried about “political correctness” that we don’t have the will to do anything about it.

If this makes your blood boil, as it did mine, forward this to everyone you know.

CHEAP LABOR! Isn’t that what the whole immigration issue is about?

Business doesn’t want to pay a decent wage.

Consumers don’t want expensive produce.

Government will tell you Americans don’t want the jobs.

But the bottom line is cheap labor. The phrase “cheap labor” is a myth, a farce, and a lie. There is no such thing as “cheap labor.”

Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for $5.00 or 6. 00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, he gets an “earned income credit” of up to $3,200 free.

He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.

He qualifies for food stamps.

He qualifies for free (no deductible, no co-pay) health care.

His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school.

He requires bilingual teachers and books.

He qualifies for relief from high energy bills.

If they are or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI. Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer’s expense.

He doesn’t worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.

Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.

He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits.

Working Americans are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after paying their bills and his.

The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean-up.

Cheap labor! YEAH RIGHT! Wake up people!

THESE ARE THE QUESTIONS WE SHOULD BE ADDRESSING TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES FOR EITHER PARTY. AND WHEN THEY LIE TO US AND DON’T DO AS THEY SAY, WE SHOULD REPLACE THEM AT ONCE!

February 18, 2008

Senator Vows To Target N.J. Businesses Hiring Illegal Aliens

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, Politics, Bills, Government, State & Local, Illegal Entry, New Jersey — Administrator @ 11:20 pm

newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj–immigration-sanct0218feb18,0,359993.story

Newsday.com

Senator Vows to Target N.J. Businesses Hiring Illegal Immigrants.

By TOM HESTER Jr.

Associated Press Writer

10:56 AM EST, February 18, 2008

TRENTON, N.J.

A New Jersey Senate leader said he will push legislation to punish businesses who knowingly hiring illegal immigrants.

Senate Majority Leader Stephen Sweeney said his decision comes after a federal judge upheld an Arizona law that prohibits businesses from knowingly hiring illegal immigrants and yanks the business licenses of those that do.

“Companies that knowingly hire illegals are destroying job opportunities for the working men and women of New Jersey,” said Sweeney, D-Gloucester. “The practice has to be stopped.”

The Immigration and Naturalization Service in 2003 estimated that New Jersey had 221,000 illegal immigrants, though the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which favors tighter border security and immigration laws, estimates the state has 490,000.

New Jersey has about 8.7 million residents and 4.1 million workers.

Under Sweeney’s measure, which he said he will introduce next week, first-time offenders would have their business licenses suspended for 10 days.

Second offenses would bring permanent revocations, Sweeney said.

In approved, the law would take effect at the end of the year and require employers to verify the legal status of their work forces.

“New Jersey should welcome legal immigrants with open arms, but we need to put up a stop sign for illegals who undermine family, educational and health care support systems,” Sweeney said.

The proposal worries businesses, said Jim Leonard, a vice president with the New Jersey Chamber of Commerce.

“We feel immigration is an issue best handled on the federal level,” Leonard said. “Creating a patchwork of laws on this issue throughout the nation makes it even more difficult to run a business.”

John Rogers, a vice president with the New Jersey Business & Industry Association, said employers are prohibited from asking certain information about an employee’s background while hiring and are legally required to take Social Security cards that appear valid.

“I fear that another New Jersey-only bill will unfairly ask the employer community to shoulder increased liability and be responsible for what is a national problem,” Rogers said.

On Feb. 8, a federal judge in Arizona dismissed a lawsuit filed by business groups against Arizona’s law, which was approved last year by the Republican-led Legislature and Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano.

Arizona business groups argued the law unconstitutionally infringed on federal immigration powers, but the judge ruled there was no conflict because states regulate business licensing.

The Arizona law took effect Jan. 1. An Oklahoma law with similar provisions takes effect for private employers in July.

Earlier rulings on similar measures have been mixed.

In July, a federal judge struck down a Hazleton, Pa., ordinance that would deny business permits for companies that employ illegal immigrants, but another judge upheld a similar measure in Valley Park, Mo., earlier this month.

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Virginia Senate Show Resistance To Anti-Illegal Immigration Bills

Filed under: Uncategorized, Bills, Government, State & Local, Illegal Entry, Local, Virginia — Administrator @ 10:00 pm

2/8/2008 - VIRGINIA - In what is sadly becoming the norm of refusal to apply U.S. Federal Laws to illegal alien issues.  Virginia Senators began ripping apart a anti-illegal immigrant legislation which had already passed the House on Monday.  They did, in the end, vote in favor of a measure aimed at only at cracking down on undocumented aliens who do commit crimes.

In a 35-5 vote, Republican Del. David Albo’s bill requiring officers to check immigration status of inmates born outside the United States did pass.

Both Senate and House did pass measures that would deny bail for any in the country illegally, as well as for businesses to lose their licenses if the business owners were convicted of hiring illegal aliens.  The House even took a step further, approving proposals to ban illegal immigrants from attending public colleges and universities and to prohibit discrimination lawsuits against employers who fire a worker for failure to speak English.

Other Anti-Illegal immigration proposals were deeply watered down or killed outright.  These proposals would have required people who wish to change their names or to apply for marriage licenses to provide proof of citizenship.
There are small steps, and still to much resistance being displayed by those elected to put America and the American people first, but at least they are beginning to step in the right direction.

July 3, 2007

Editorials on Immigration Legislation - ARTICLE

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, Bills, Amnesty Bill — Administrator @ 11:48 am
Editorials on immigration legislation
McClatchy-Tribune News Service
Article Last Updated: 07/02/2007 06:53:55 PM MDT

The following editorial appeared in the Miami Herald on Friday, June 29:
SENATE FALTERS ON IMMIGRATION REFORM
The Senate’s decision to slam the door shut on immigration reform Thursday represents an enormous failure that borders on dereliction of duty. Congress has walked away from the problem and left the broken immigration system for someone else to fix. All because the people’s elected representatives could not muster the courage or political will to deal with a controversial topic.
The only real issue before the Senate was whether the reform legislation improves the chaotic status quo, which is rightly deemed unacceptable by both advocates and opponents of immigration reform. But instead of voting on the merits of the package, the Senate punted. By a margin of 53-46, members voted against limiting debate. This stalling tactic opens the door to an endless stream of amendments and could have postponed a final vote on the merits until Doomsday. This was not the Senate’s finest moment.
As Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., lamented afterward, the failure to act carries a high price. Instead of establishing pathways to legal status for an estimated 12 million immigrants who live in the shadows, there will be more immigration raids that terrorize businesses and immigrant communities. State and local governments will continue adding to the volume of conflicting ordinances that characterize our patchwork system of immigration laws.
For President Bush, who sought to make immigration reform his crowning domestic achievement, this represents a severe setback. Although he had lobbied hard for the bill and even threw an extra $4 billion into the enforcement pot to revive debate earlier this month, 37 senators from his own party - including the two from his home state of Texas - voted against curtailing debate.
For opponents of the immigration bill, this is a hollow victory. They cannot claim to have solved the immigration problem because they never offered solutions other than building fences and demanding large-scale immigration round-ups. The former won’t work - not for long, anyway. Ultimately, people find ways over, around or under fences. Mass deportations aren’t a solution, either. “It sounds good,” President Bush said on a visit to the border region in Arizona last April. “It won’t happen.”
Ultimately, as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said, immigration reform will be back on the legislative agenda. It’s just a matter of when. Like the epic struggle against segregation that ended with the passage of civil-rights legislation, it may take a few years and a few stumbles to get to the finish line, but this issue is too important to remain unresolved. Immigration, too, is a controversial topic, and it, too, is a matter of simple justice.

The following editorial appeared in the Chicago Tribune on Friday, June 29:
THE SPEECH BUSH DIDN’T GIVE
U.S. senators who tried for two years to solve this nation’s immigration dilemma met a bracing truth Thursday: Too many Americans distrust their comprehensive plan to regulate the flow of foreigners into this country and its economy.
Immigration reform now lies in ruin. That doesn’t mean supporters of a broad immigration bill will or ought to surrender. It should, though, force them to admit they didn’t do the hard work that would convince Americans to back their efforts to reduce illegal immigration and control the legal immigration our economy needs.
Specifically, they never admitted how spectacularly they and their like-minded predecessors failed to keep their word after Congress rewrote immigration law in 1986. They didn’t do the difficult work that would have kept a respected, pro-business lawmaker such as Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, from recently telling a New York Times reporter how much he regrets his vote for that bill 21 years ago: “I thought then that taking care of 3 million people illegally in the country would solve the problem once and for all. I found out, however, if you reward illegality, you get more of it.” The proponents also had no retort when Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., said he had supported the 1986 law “based on the very same promises we hear today. . . . I will not vote to make the same mistake twice.”
Thursday’s devastating defeat didn’t have to be. Suppose that after the 2004 election, President George W. Bush had leveled with his fellow Americans:
“Back in 1986, the people who write this nation’s laws made promises they didn’t even attempt to keep. They promised you they would control our borders, stop our employers from hiring illegal immigrants and give legal status to 3 million people who were here in violation of the law.
“But in succeeding years, Washington broke its pledges - all except the one about legalizing those 3 million people. Members of Congress who’d voted for the bill stopped talking about enforcement, let alone demanding it. They had placated big business and immigrant communities full of potential voters, and they’d gotten what they wanted from President Reagan-his signature and his morning-in-America endorsement: ‘Future generations of Americans will be thankful for our efforts to humanely regain control of our borders.’
“Those pieties of 1986 have rung hollow ever since, and until we get square with you, the American people, (U.S. Sens.) Ted Kennedy and John McCain and I and everybody else in Washington who wants to fix immigration will get just as much of your trust on this as we deserve.
“Now, though, this cause has what it needs, a president committed to fixing this mess before he leaves office. You may not like me, but you know how I get when I’m resolute. I won’t flinch.
“What matters more is that, on this issue more than most, you voters terrify Congress - Republicans and Democrats, Senate and House. Unless you give your permission, reform won’t happen.
“So here’s what we in Washington have to do. We have to enforce the 1986 law we’ve got. It may take us a couple of years to gear up, and you may not like what you get. Expect higher prices for the goods and services you purchase when we start forcing employers to abide by that law.
“But we will show you that government can make a good-faith effort to do what it’s supposed to do, which is enforce the law. We’re not just going to spend more money on border control. We’re going to cut the flow of illegal immigrants.
“This time, though, don’t judge us by our gauzy promises and our optimistic predictions and our billions spent for border agents and technology. Judge us by whether we succeed.
“Because when we show you that we know how to enforce a law, we’ll earn your support for a new one. I could say a lot today about what we’ll gain from the new citizens and legal guest workers and other benefits a reform bill will give us, but until I earn your trust, I don’t have the right to say any of that.”
That would have been a fine speech for Bush to give in 2004. Just as it would be a fine speech for him, and for Democrats and Republicans who want immigration reform, to give in 2007.
After Thursday’s vote, those who want a comprehensive immigration bill have to find a radically new way forward.
Do they want to be seen now and always as ruthlessly tactical, as their Senate supporters were this week in trying to silence debate on a bill that - whether you favor or oppose it - unarguably would change the fabric of America?
Or will they recognize that Washington has to climb out of a hole it dug 21 years ago? A hole that got perilously deeper each year the demands of the ‘86 law didn’t even get lip service from our members of Congress and our presidents?

The following editorial appeared in the Philadelphia Inquirer on Friday, June 29:
IMMIGRATION BILL FAILS: A MERCIFUL ENDING
Sometimes the only thing you can do for a badly wounded animal is put it down. Any disappointment in the Senate’s inability to pass immigration reform must be tempered by an acknowledgment that the bill had become so mangled that it needed to be put out of its misery.
No one was totally happy with the bill. Often that is a sign of fruitful negotiation. But this proposal so compromised principles on both sides of the argument that in the end few had the stomach to keep fighting.
Both Democrats and Republicans were opposing the bill when a procedural vote ended the fiasco Thursday. The vote sent a clear message to President Bush, who personally lobbied for the bill, that his low poll ratings have made him a paper tiger in his own party.
Conservatives kept harping about the need to make America’s border with Mexico more secure. The dead bill would have done that. It included not only increasing the Border Patrol, but also adding fencing and electronic surveillance at key spots.
The stickier point that still has most Americans scratching their heads is what to do with the 12 million or more people who have entered this nation illegally.
The defeated bill included a path to citizenship, but it was decried by critics as granting “amnesty.” That was hardly the case, unless you deem anything short of deportation as amnesty.
The bill called for fines, fees and other steps before eligible persons could apply first for legal residency and then for citizenship. It’s not amnesty when you have to pay a fine for what you did.
But the path had problems. For example, it treated all illegal residents the same; an earlier version made clearer, proper distinctions between new arrivals and those who had lived and worked in this country for years.
What happens next is a guess. Immigration will likely be a hot topic in the 2008 elections. Some steps are proceeding to make borders more secure. Immigration officials are making more raids to catch undocumented workers. But not enough is being done to sanction the companies that hire and often exploit them.
America must find the will to balance its immigration concerns and its Statue of Liberty ideals.

The following editorial appeared in the Dallas Morning News on Friday, June 29:
BUSH LOST ON IMMIGRATION BUT WAS ON RIGHT SIDE
The senators who voted Thursday to cut off debate on the immigration bill did the nation no good deed. We’re particularly disappointed that Texas Sens. Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn sided with the bunch who effectively killed it.
The two knew, as did everyone else, that the vote to limit debate was a way to get the legislation yanked off the floor. Now Americans have little more than a lick and a promise that the Senate will get back to work on the issue this year or next.
President Bush, on the other hand, deserves enormous credit for pushing immigration to the top of Washington’s domestic agenda. His stand on behalf of a better immigration system is like what he did as governor when he pressed legislators to overhaul Texas’ school funding system. Ironically, he lost that battle too, again because some Senate Republicans went south on him. But he was right when he warned Austin about a coming crisis, just as he has been correct to encourage Washington to find a saner way of dealing with immigration.
We hope he and immigration reformers like Sen. Ted Kennedy keep the battle going. Mr. Kennedy also worked valiantly to find a compromise that would satisfy enough senators to win passage. Mr. Kennedy, the president and several others tried to build a coalition from the center out, usually the only way to get a victory in Washington.
They didn’t succeed this time, but it’s better to take on a good fight and fail than not to take it on for fear of losing.
It’s also best for the nation to solve this problem sooner rather than later. If Congress waits two or three more years, we’ll have another million illegal immigrants. We’ll have more employers looking the other way when it comes to hiring illegal workers. And we’ll lack enough agents to protect our borders. This is one problem that will only get worse with time.

The following editorial appeared in the Orlando Sentinel on Friday, June 29:
THE DEFEAT OF IMMIGRATION REFORM DEALS A BLOW TO ALL AMERICANS
The Senate came to a contentious dead end on the issue of immigration reform Thursday. It’s a failure that will be felt way beyond the borders of Washington.
Americans lost big Thursday. They can thank a group of Republicans and a handful of Democrats who cried amnesty without offering reasonable alternatives. These naysayers got their wish by torpedoing a vote that would have ended the debate and moved the bill toward passage.
Guess what? The bill included a $4.4 billion provision for increased border security. It’s a cruel irony that these lawmakers voted to make our borders less secure.
The winners? How about unscrupulous employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants? This bill’s failure lets them off the hook. There would have been much stronger rules requiring employee verification. Tamper-proof cards would have helped weed out undocumented workers and opened up the job market for U.S. citizens who claim they are deprived of jobs that go to cheap, illegal labor.
Rejecting the bill also closed doors for American companies who need high-tech workers who would come here under a temporary work visa. Now high-tech companies that can’t find enough qualified workers here will send the work overseas, hurting the American economy.
The bill’s failure also makes it more difficult for law enforcement, since an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants will remain unchecked. Although the majority of them are law-abiding folks, there is a criminal element that will continue to live here with little fear of being discovered by a thorough immigration system.
This bill wasn’t perfect, but it was a compromise that offered something to both sides of the immigration debate. Now, nobody gets a thing, and the saddest part is that immigration reform will remain in legal limbo for two more years because of the 2008 election season coming up.
All that’s left are the hard feelings from a bitter debate that too often vilified people with principled objections.
Immigration now becomes the focus of advocacy groups intent to make senators who opposed this bill accountable at the polls. As well they should be. Expect a backlash from the expanding universe of Hispanic voters. But all Americans had an interest in seeing this issue resolved.
The scorecard reads 37 Republicans and 15 Democrats and one Independent voting against the bill. To their credit, Florida Sens. Mel Martinez and Bill Nelson voted for the bill.
They understood the bipartisan strength it would take to hold the bill together. Now, as Martinez noted, the burden shifts to others to see what solutions they will offer.
They had a workable answer in their hands, and dropped it.
All Americans lose.

June 22, 2007

20 Dishonorable Loopholes in Senate Amnesty Bill - Sen. Jeff Sessions

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, Bills, U.S. Security, Government, Congress, Amnesty Bill — Administrator @ 10:54 pm

Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) has published the twenty loopholes he’s managed to find placed in the Amnesty bill aka S.1639 aka S.1348. for the American people.

In Sen. Sessions own words yesterday on the “Sean Hannity Radio Show”, the only thing different about the new bill (new in number anyways) is an increase of $4.4 billion dollars.

Read Sen. Sessions Press Release regarding the $4.4 billion dollars.

Read Sen. Sessions 20 Loopholes

Next Page »