lframerica.com Blog

April 17, 2008

U.S. Attorney In Roanoke Announces Resignation

Filed under: Uncategorized, Politics, Virginia, United States News — Administrator @ 9:47 pm

www.wtopnews.com

April 17, 2008 - 10:08am

ROANOKE, Va. (AP) - The U.S. attorney for the Western District of Virginia, John Brownlee, has announced his resignation.

The 43-year-old Brownlee said in a statement Thursday that he will resign effective May 16. He has held the post since August of 2001.

Brownlee’s cases included prosecution of the maker of the painkiller OxyContin on charges of misleading the public about its risk of addiction, and ITT for illegally sending overseas classified night-vision technology used by the U.S. military.

His office also has prosecuted local government corruption cases, drug trafficking and capital murder.

April 16, 2008

Vista High Student Diagnosed With TB

Filed under: Uncategorized, Schools, Health Threats, State & Local, California — Administrator @ 3:50 am

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20080414-1525-vista-tb.html

SAN DIEGO – A Vista High School student was diagnosed with tuberculosis, prompting county health officials Monday to notify classmates, faculty and staff who may have been exposed.School officials have notified about 120 students, teachers and staff that were potentially exposed to the disease between March 1-28, according to the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency.

“Tuberculosis is in our community,” said Dr. Wilma Wooten, the county’s public health officer. “Fortunately, it is curable. We want the public to be informed about TB, in hopes of keeping the disease from spreading.”

Symptoms of active TB include persistent cough, fever, night sweats and unexplained weight loss, according to the HHSA. Most people who are exposed to tuberculosis do not develop the disease.

There were 280 cases of tuberculosis reported in San Diego County in 2007, according to the HHSA. So far, there have been 46 cases of the disease reported locally this year.

April 6, 2008

Life After An Illegal Immigrant Is Sent Home

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, World News, Mexico, United States News — Administrator @ 8:31 pm

While this is a touching story and one can not help but feel sorry for the hardship faced by these individuals, one also has to realize that they themselves entered into another country illegally, and as such had not taken the proper steps (in 18 years in this case) to gain legal citizenship in the country.   Stories like this should prompt Mexican citizens and Mexican organizations within the United States to work to improve conditions in Mexico.  They should prompt those individuals and organizations to work towards assuring returning Mexican illegal immigrants from the United States have a job, shelter and government needed aid to help them adapt back to their native land.  One can only hope these organizations put that into action as it would benefit far more people then just focusing on illegal immigrants within the United States.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2004330685_mexicoana06m.html 

MEXICO CITY — Ana Reyes walks briskly through a crowded neighborhood here, out of place among the provocatively dressed women of the night soliciting work in the middle of the day.

The 41-year-old mother of four slips through the entrance of a clothing store, its racks thick with the latest fashion, a sign on the door indicating the shop is hiring female assistants.

She approaches the manager about the job but is told it’s only for women 20 to 30 years old.

Manager Maria Inez elaborates when prompted: “A younger girl will be able to bring more male customers into the store. She’s too old.”

Ten months after she was picked up by immigration officers in an early-morning raid of her Burien home and soon deported to Mexico, Reyes — jobless and broke — struggles to eke out the barest existence in the dirt-poor barrios of one of the world’s biggest and most crowded cities.

After nearly two decades picking hops and fruit in Eastern Washington and cleaning hotel rooms near Seattle, she was among more than 870,000 Mexicans the U.S. government expelled from the country last year.

For all the attention illegal immigrants get in the U.S. — from those who believe they’re a drain on social services to advocates who say they do the jobs Americans won’t — little is known about what happens to them after they’re ushered by U.S. immigration authorities through revolving doors into Mexico’s border towns.

Once there, they get little help from their government. Many stay, others try to get back to their hometowns. For the most part no one tracks them — not their government, or the U.S., or their advocacy groups in the states. They become largely forgotten — along with the U.S.-born children they sometimes take with them.

Reyes’ two adult sons, Christian and Carlos Quiroz, whom she and her then-husband had brought illegally into the U.S. as little boys, were also returned to Mexico last year.

And with no family in the U.S., Reyes’ two American daughters, Julie Quiroz, now 13, and Sharise Hernandez, 6, have also joined her here.

Now, unable to find work in a city she left 18 years ago, Reyes shuffles between the cramped homes of a brother and a sister in neighborhoods so unsafe her children aren’t allowed outside to play.

Neither daughter is in school.

The older one longs for her life in Seattle, saying that on the rare occasion she gets close enough to the hotels that cater to tourists here, she strains to hear Americans speak. “I always think that if I had the courage I’d go up and talk to them,” Julie said.

For her mother, small things, like the Starbucks white-chocolate mocha her son sometimes buys her, remind her of their old life. And some days she thinks of little else but how to get it back.

“It’s ugly here,” Reyes said, sitting in her sister’s living room, her children and other family members around her.

“I never wanted to come back here to live. I wanted to stay and watch my daughters go to school and graduate, have the kind of life I didn’t have.”

Fuel for economy

The engine of the American service economy runs on the labor of many of the 12 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally.

Many had fled poverty in small towns across Mexico and Latin America, becoming the cheap labor that builds houses, cleans hotel rooms and tends gardens in the U.S.

In recent years, stepped-up immigration enforcement increasingly has led to their arrests in work-site raids, on routine traffic stops, when immigration officers sweep through jails and prisons or, in cases such as Reyes’, when they show up at the front door.

“This country simply can’t absorb them all,” said Neil Clark, Seattle-based field-office director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, pointing out the U.S. already admits about 1 million legal immigrants a year.

“People have got to demand changes in their home countries if they want to make things better,” he said. “Coming to the U.S. is not the solution to Mexico’s problems.”

Neither, it seems, is deportation.

For Mexico, the return of illegal immigrants is a double punch: The economy loses the deportees’ share of some $24 billion that Mexicans abroad send home each year. And back in the small towns they fled, deportees compete for what few low-paying jobs exist.

“Sometimes they leave with much fanfare and dreams of getting the family out of poverty — only to be sent back home, their deportation seen as a failure,” said Erica Dahl-Bredine, country manager for Catholic Relief Services Mexico, based in Tucson, Ariz.

So many don’t go back home but instead remain in border towns such as Tijuana and Juárez — sometimes because they don’t have money for a bus ticket home but mostly because they’re waiting for a chance to re-enter the U.S.

It’s what Reyes might have done last July if she’d had the money to pay a smuggler to help her return to the U.S. Instead, she returned to her family in Mexico City, buying time while she figures out a way to get back to Seattle.

She’d first come to the attention of U.S. immigration authorities in 1998 when she got into a fight with another woman on a street in the Eastern Washington town of Sunnyside, violating a restraining order.

In 2003, an immigration judge granted her a chance to leave the U.S. voluntarily, saying her daughters were young enough that they could adjust to life in Mexico. She appealed and lost, but never left, she said, because she kept hoping changes in U.S. immigration laws would allow her to stay legally.

She was asleep the morning 10 months ago when a team of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers knocked on the door of her apartment, her name on their fugitive list for that day.

Among those inside, besides her two daughters, were her younger son, Carlos; her boyfriend and the father of her younger daughter, Arturo Hernandez; and her brother-in-law Luis Hernandez. The men were all returned to Mexico. Reyes’ older son was living in Tacoma and deported several months later.

Later, Reyes would remark that if deported, she would not bring her daughters to Mexico because she would not be staying long.

She couldn’t have known how bad things would get for her here.

Mexico City as home

The metropolitan area of Mexico City is the second-largest in the world — teeming with congestion, pollution and poverty. The divide between rich and poor is vast.

It is, in so many ways, removed from the green landscape and fresh air of Western Washington, where Reyes lived in an apartment complex and worked as a hotel maid for nearly half her years in the U.S. On good days, she earned about $70 a day, her boyfriend about twice that.

Much of what the family had was left behind in the Burien apartment: a microwave, beds, tables, other furniture. “Everything that I worked really hard for,” Reyes said.

Now, in Mexico, home is sometimes her brother’s third-floor, two-bedroom apartment near the historic center of the city, where drug dealers and prostitutes hug grimy street corners, conducting business in full view of the police.

Mostly, it’s her sister Patricia Reyes’ cramped two-bedroom house in Arboledas, a poor neighborhood that is part of the city’s stubborn march toward the mountains surrounding it.

The house is like many others throughout the city, joined to those on either side, with the street as its front yard.

Her family lives like many in Mexico’s large cities, doubling and sometimes tripling up under the same roof. Up to 10 family members sometimes share her sister’s home. Reyes sleeps on a mattress on the floor, a wooden bar braced at the front door to keep rats from scurrying inside.

She is often depressed, her family said.

“We’re been back and forth, back and forth,” Reyes said. “It’s the hardest thing because I had my own place up there, my own car, my own money. I have nothing here.”

Looking for work

Reyes’ age, long absence from Mexico and lack of a high-school diploma help explain why the hotels, restaurants and stores where she seeks work aren’t calling her back.

“I tried the hotel jobs and even when I tell them how much experience I have, I still don’t get called,” she said. “They say that someone younger will produce more than me.”

Susanna Noguez, who works in the protection department in the Mexican consulate office in Seattle, said, “If she has the intention of finding any kind of work, it’s not easy, but it’s not impossible.”

In this city, getting work also depends on whom you know.

Reyes’ 68-year-old father slowly shakes his head when asked if he can use his position as a former government worker to help.

“Before, when I was younger, there was lots of work here — enough for everybody,” Luis Reyes said. “Now everything has gotten more corrupt … .”

“The people I can call, they’re all retired, like me. They can’t help.”

So five evenings a week, Reyes does what many of her generation here do to make a living — she peddles on the street.

She and sister Patricia roll a food cart up a dusty street to sell quesadillas for 70 cents, gorditas for 90 cents. On a good night they can clear $20. On this particular one, they had three customers.

One was 28-year-old Santo Lopez, who had been deported from the U.S. only a few months earlier. He had lived for four years in Hope, Ark., he said, holding down jobs in a mechanic shop and at a warehouse.

He’s found a food-processing job here that pays $80 for a six-day week but says he could make that same amount in two or three hours in the states.

“I hear they are now jailing people they catch trying to cross the border,” he said. “If things get much worse for me here, I might consider just that. Life in detention in the states might be better than it is here.”

Lopez bought three quesadillas.

On evenings like these, unsold inventory becomes the family’s meal. At the end of every day, everyone in the family pools what money they made that day.

“And that’s how we survive,” Reyes said. “It’s not the life I imagined for my kids.”

But many who oppose the presence of illegal immigrants in the U.S. say it’s right to deport them and that the hard realities of life across the border are Mexico’s to resolve.

“Maybe if the Mexican government was half as concerned about its people in Mexico, so many of them would not be trying to get out,” said Ira Mehlman, spokesman for the Federation of American Immigration Reform.

How it began

Reyes grew up in a relatively poor neighborhood near central Mexico City, one of four children.

She didn’t finish high school but attended a trade school, where she was trained as a secretary and later got work with the government.

She married young and had her first child at 18 and her second child four years later.

In the late 1980s, her husband followed the wave of Mexicans going north for jobs in the fruit farms in Washington and California.

He crossed illegally and settled in Eastern Washington; she followed in 1990, walking three hours with a smuggler whom her husband had paid $1,000.

She said she was apprehended by U.S. border authorities and promised a work permit, Social Security number and legal status if she would testify against the coyote.

But the smuggler ended up admitting to the charges and the deal for the green card was off, though Reyes was granted what most illegal immigrants covet — a valid Social Security number and a work permit, which would expire a few months later.

The couple settled outside Yakima in Sunnyside, where they worked in the hops fields, then picked apples and cherries.

About a year later, they sent for their boys, 7 and 3 at the time, paying a coyote to guide the children through the desert.

But authorities stopped the boys and the smuggler. The children, now grown, speak of spending days in foster homes, separated from one other and afraid, before their father came from Washington and all three crossed with a coyote.

Reyes’ relationship with her husband grew strained, and in the winter of 1998, he moved without the family to Western Washington.

With no money, she and her children were evicted from their Sunnyside apartment. They moved in with Arturo Hernandez, who was renting a small trailer in the same town.

Together, in 2001, they followed other Mexican fruit pickers to the construction, restaurant and hotel jobs in and around Seattle. Reyes landed a job at SeaTac Crest Motor Inn, where Manager Karl Singh calls her a “really hard and honest worker.”

“We still miss her,” he said.

Plotting their return

Soon after she was deported, Reyes, the girls and her younger son went to live with Hernandez and his family in a small town outside Aguascalientes, some 300 miles northwest of Mexico City.

It is here they sometimes return when they need to give her brother and sister some space. When they arrive, the two-bedroom house Hernandez shares with his extended family comes alive. Reyes and the kids say they feel safer here. There are other children for the girls to play with and they can walk the few blocks to the neighborhood store.

Hernandez, who had been employed by a Tacoma boat builder for $20 an hour, now starts his days tending his father’s horses and goats. He’s not found a job because all seem to require the high-school diploma he doesn’t have.

He had gone to the U.S. when he was 16, making enough to send money back to his aging parents every two weeks.

“Now I’m back and there’s nothing here,” he said. “My parents have to help me because I have no money.”

His mother said she was apprehensive when he left. “He was still a boy,” Maria Pilar said. “I prayed that he would be fine.”

When his mother first learned he was being deported, she was at once happy because she would be seeing him again and devastated by what she knew were dim prospects.

So he and Reyes, along with her grown sons, haven’t stopped plotting ways to get back to Seattle.

She thinks her only chance of doing that legally is years away and hinges on daughter Julie, whom she thinks can petition for her when she turns 21.

But it’s not that simple: Because Reyes lived illegally in the states for 17 years, she faces a 10-year bar to legal entry. So Julie would have to be 23 and have a home established in the U.S. before she could petition for her mother to join her.

Reyes and Hernandez are considering an offer from an Edmonds real-estate investor who learned of their circumstances and has offered to help them relocate to Juárez. The girls could stay with a family in El Paso, Texas, and attend school there during the week. But the idea of seeing her mother only on weekends worries Julie.

A few months ago, it was a different plan — to cross illegally with a group of people who had been deported from Phoenix.

Then they heard that a cold front had passed through the desert, leaving four people dead of exposure. And they found out that U.S. immigration authorities are now jailing — not just catching and releasing — those caught sneaking across the border.

So that plan, at least for now, is on hold.

ACLU Community Forum To Focus On Human, Civil Rights On The Border

Filed under: Illegal Alien, U.S. Security, State & Local, Texas, United States News — Administrator @ 3:57 am

http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/rights_85433___article.html/civil_border.html

The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas will hold a community meeting Thursday in Brownsville to discuss human rights and civil rights issues on the border.

The event is co-sponsored by the Coalition of Amigos in Solidarity and Action (CASA).  Border residents are urged to attend the meeting to voice their concerns about the border wall, immigration detention centers, and collaboration between local law enforcement officers and the Border Patrol, among other issues.

“We really want to hear from border residents about what worries them, what issues are important in their communities,” said Rebecca Bernhardt, Director of Policy Development at the ACLU of Texas, “and what they want for their communities in the future.”

The meeting will include “Know Your Rights” training about residents’ legal rights in law enforcement encounters, and attorneys and other advocates will be available to answer questions from community members.

“This information is important for residents so they know what to do when they are approached by police officers or border patrol officers in their homes, in their cars, and on the street,” Bernhardt said.  “They will learn what law enforcement constitutionally can and cannot do.”

CASA member E. Elizabeth Garcia said CASA is getting complaints from community members that during routine traffic stops police officers are asking about their immigration status.

“Many in our community live in fear of being targeted and subjected to invasive, inappropriate questioning,” Garcia said.  “For this reason, we want to provide community members with an opportunity to discuss their experiences as well as information on how to handle these types of incidents.”

The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. at San Felipe de Jesus Church, 2218 Carlos Avenue. Dinner and refreshments will be provided.

Crackdown in Prince William, VA Yields Charges

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, State & Local, Virginia, United States News — Administrator @ 1:26 am

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/05/AR2008040501135.html

Prince William County Police Chief Charlie T. Deane said most of the people arrested during the first month of the country’s illegal-immigration crackdown would have gone to jail anyway.

Of the 89 people questioned about their citizenship status, 41 were taken to the county’s adult detention center. Although officers have reason to think the 41 people arrested are in the country illegally, all but two were charged with a series of misdemeanors and felonies unrelated to their immigration status.

“Most of them would have been made anyway,” Deane said during a news conference to provide details about the county’s first month of increased illegal immigration enforcement.

Seven people were charged with felonies, including attempted murder, cocaine possession and shoplifting. Thirty-two people were charged with misdemeanors, which included public drunkenness, domestic assault and lack of a driver’s license. Two others were detained on immigration-related charges.

The Board of County Supervisors voted last fall to direct officers to check the citizenship or immigration status of suspects they think might be in the country illegally. The measure took effect March 3.

Of the 89 people questioned about their residency status, two were found to be in the country legally, Deane said.

Among those thought to be in the country illegally, 21 were released without charges and 25 were given citations for minor offenses. Police are referring the 87 cases to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“Our job is to communicate that” to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Deane said. “What happens after that is out of our hands.”

To put the numbers into perspective, Prince William police officers generally make 1,100 arrests a month, Deane said.

Supervisor John T. Stirrup Jr. (R-Gainesville) said that the first month’s numbers were consistent with his expectations but that it’s too early to determine the long-term effect.

“The reports I’ve been getting narratively are strong endorsements that criminal activity has reduced,” he said. “The presence of [illegal immigrants] has significantly reduced. It’s had a positive impact.”

Deane said he is concerned about perceptions in the community that police will set up checkpoints to question people about their citizenship status.

“We don’t do immigration roadblocks; we are not going to sweep day-labor sites,” he said.

Deane held a community meeting with Mexican Consul General Enrique Escorza to clear up misinformation and to quell fears about the scope of the county’s illegal immigration policies.

The cost of the illegal immigration measures for the first year will be $6.4 million. It is one of several public safety initiatives in the county’s budget for fiscal 2009, which begins July 1.

April 5, 2008

Brothers Indicted In Alleged Immigration Scheme

http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/brothers_85658___article.html/bernardo_indicted.html

A federal grand jury has returned a 19-count indictment against twin brothers Alberto and Bernardo Peña, and three others on charges of obtaining fraudulent work visas for more than 80 Indian nationals.

The Peña brothers, both 38, face charges of obtaining fraudulent H-2B visas, which are used to procure foreign manual labor. The visas are for non-immigrants and allow an employer in the United States to hire foreign workers for temporary non-agricultural work, according to federal court documents.

Also named in the indictment are Mahendrakumar “Mack” Patel, 55, Rakesh Patel, 36, and Marte Othon Villar Sr., 48, according to federal court documents. Are all charged with encouraging and inducing the illegal immigration of the Indian nationals in exchange for thousands of dollars per visa.

“Today’s significant charges represent the excellent task force-like efforts of four federal agencies,” U.S. Attorney Don DeGabrielle said in a prepared statement issued Friday. “All of the criminal charges are the result of a multi-agency, multi-jurisdictional investigation.” Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Department of State, Department of Labor, and the Internal Revenue Service all worked together on the case.

Charles Keith Viscardi, 48, the owner and manager of a construction company located in New Iberia, La., is alleged to have enlisted AMEB Business Group Inc., a visa facilitation firm owned and operated by the Peñas and Villar, to hire foreign workers.

Viscardi asked AMEB Business Group Inc. to procure foreign manual labor under the H-2B visa program.

Viscardi, who was charged on March 20 with conspiring to encourage and induce illegal immigration in connection with the Indian scheme, is scheduled to appear before U.S. Magistrate Colvin Botley. If convicted, he faces up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

AMEB procured workers from Mexico for Viscardi’s construction company, however, the Peñas and Villar also submitted documentation to the Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigration Services and other governmental agencies seeking workers from India on behalf of Viscardi.

Mack, of Fort Worth, and Rakesh, of Houston, recruited citizens of India who were willing to pay between $20,000 to $80,000 in exchange for visas to enter the U.S., the news release states.

In spring 2006, Alberto and Bernardo traveled to India to assist the Indian nationals with the application process and allegedly visited and communicated with the U.S. Consulate in Mumbai.

The U.S. Consulate in Mumbai received an anonymous fax on Feb. 26, 2006, “which alleged that a recent group of visa applicants had each fraudulently obtained visas by paying an unknown U.S. person fees between $57,000 to $68,000,” court documents show.

The 88 Indian nationals began to arrive in the United States from late February to late March 2006 and entered the country, court documents show.

Each of the Indian nationals that were granted H-2B visas arrived to Houston, where they made payments for their visas in the form of cash, cashiers checks and international money orders.

“None of the Indian nationals were ever employed by Viscardi at the construction company,” the news release states. “Instead, they simply disappeared throughout the U.S. after paying for their fraudulently obtained visas. All of the conspirators, including Villar and Viscardi, shared in the proceeds derived from the scheme.”

All defendants are accused of assisting in the procurement of the H-2B visas for the Indian nationals, although they allegedly knew none had intentions of working for the company that obtained the visas on their behalf.

If convicted, they each face a maximum penalty of up to 15 years in prison and a $500,000 fine. Bernardo faces an additional 20 years in prison and a $500,000 fine if convicted of money laundering for the purpose of concealment. Mack and Alberto each face an additional 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted of violating the money laundering spending statute.

Mack and Rakesh appeared Thursday before U.S. Magistrate Mary Milloy in Houston. They were released on a $50,000 bond. They are scheduled to appear in federal court on April 15 before U.S. Magistrate Calvin Botley in Houston.

Alberto appeared Friday before Milloy and was released on a $50,000 bond.

Bernardo and Villar remain at large, and warrants for their arrest have been issued.

Anyone with information regarding their whereabouts is asked to contact U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at 1-866-DHS-2-ICE (866-347-2423).

April 4, 2008

Day-Labor Numbers Dropping In Orange

Filed under: Uncategorized, Illegal Alien, State & Local, California, United States News — Administrator @ 8:55 pm

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/day-laborers-city-2011287-deberry-ordinance

New ordinances cracking down on businesses allowing day workers to congregate add to declining numbers in Orange. 

ORANGE – The number of day laborers in town has dropped 80 percent this year, in the wake of two municipal laws meant to stopping the laborers from congregating and soliciting work, city officials say.

The Police Department keeps statistics on sightings of apparent day laborers.

Further, City Attorney David DeBerry said he spotted approximately eight day laborers at Chapman and Hewes avenues on a recent day.

“That’s a huge drop,” DeBerry said. “There’s usually 70.”

City officials say no business has applied for a permit to allow day laborers to congregate on their property since a city law went into effect.

Councilman Jon Dumitru said the new law, enacted on March 13, adds to the ordinance enacted in January aimed at stopping day laborers from soliciting for work.

Under the latest law, city businesses that want to allow day laborers and those who want to employ them to congregate on their property must get a permit from the city.

“It’s not just day laborers, it’s also the people hiring them,” Dumitru said. “We’re going both directions on it.”

The ordinance states that permits are not needed if four or fewer day laborers gather. The fine for violating the ordinance is $250 for the first offense, $500 for the second – and $1,000 and up to three months in jail for the third.

DeBerry said 30 citations were handed out from Jan. 17 to March 1. Police logs show that just three citations were handed out in March.

“The ordinance seems to be working. Every once in a while, you’ll see more than one or two day laborers,” Mayor Carolyn Cavecche said.

Thursday morning, at Moreno’s Restaurant on Chapman Avenue, about six men gathered in front. Restaurant owner Javier Moreno said he had not received any official notice of the city ordinance.

“They eat and have coffee,” Moreno said. “I haven’t had any problems with them whatsoever.”

DeBerry said police went to different businesses along Chapman to tell owners about the new ordinance.

“Typically, how the situation would be handled is that we would receive a complaint about a business that was allowing day laborers on the premises,” DeBerry said. “Then we would go out and let them know the day laborers would have to leave, be reduced to four or less or the business would need to get a permit.”

Jose Herrera, 35, returned to the U.S. from Mexico two months ago and had little success finding work by standing at Hewes and Chapman. Herrera said the ordinance is the reason would-be employers don’t pull up looking for workers anymore.

“I’ve seen a lot of police cars, there are signs saying we can’t stand here and look for work,” Herrera said. “Police and sheriff officers stop by and tell us to leave or we’ll get fined, so we leave. But we need to work, so we come back.”

Stricter enforcement eligibility requirements at the Resource Center have resulted in a drop in patronage.

“They’re required to present two forms of identification and be able to present a Federal I-9 form in order to be used,” Dumitru said.”

DeBerry said the combination of ordinances and enforcement might have driven out day labors from other cities.

“We had some evidence that day laborers were coming from other jurisdictions,” DeBerry said. “Maybe they’ve stayed in their own areas.”

Herrera said he’s heard some laborers have moved out of state, to Oregon for example, because of the lack of work.

USDA Begins Conservation Program In Cameron County

Filed under: Uncategorized, Environment, State & Local, Texas — Administrator @ 4:15 am

http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/woodard_85614___article.html/county_fsa.html

April 3, 2008

SAN BENITO - Private landowners throughout the Rio Grande Valley are getting a chance to restore more than a dozen different species of wildlife on the state’s conservation list, including the endangered ocelot.

After decades of conservation projects, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency wants to enroll 5,000 acres for the Conservation Reserve Program to re-establish Tamaulipan thornscrub habitat for the ocelot and other wildlife.

Micky D. Woodard, chief of the conservation division at the FSA, said landowners and producers can designate portions of their property to try to re-establish the ocelot’s habitat. Landowners involved in the effort will enter into 15-year contracts with FSA.

Woodard met Wednesday with a number of FSA officials from Cameron, Hidalgo, Willacy and Kenedy counties to discuss the CRP’s Lower Rio Grande Valley Thornscrub Restoration Project State Acres for Wildlife Enhancement (SAFE).

“This is a voluntary program designed to enhance a national restoration program,” Woodard said.

Nearly 90 percent of the original thornscrub habitat in the Valley has been lost by conversion to agricultural production and, later, urban areas.

About 650,000 targeted acres are within the SAFE area, including eastern Cameron County, eastern and northern Willacy County, east-central Hidalgo County and southern Kenedy County.

“Other wildlife can also increase,” Woodard said. “It’s a long-term goal.”

Landowners who want to participate can benefit from incentives, cost-share and maintenance payments for establishing and maintaining habitat, officials said.

“The payment is a sort of enticement,” Woodard said. “This is compensation to them.”

Cris Perez, the Cameron County FSA executive director, said the money paid to landowners is based on the agricultural value of the land. In Cameron County, that base rental rate for the land is $40 an acre, he said.

“This isn’t a way to make a lot of money, but they do get compensated,” Perez said.

Already, people are interested in trying to restore ocelot habitat.

Woodard said the program is devoted to row crop agriculture, with scattered citrus groves with high rates of wind erosion also included.

There’s no maximum limit a landowner is able to use in the program.

“We want to work with him and whatever he’s willing to do,” Woodard said.

It can take up to 25 years to determine if the restored habitats have any effect, Woodard said.

The FSA will stop its involvement and payments on the rental of the 5,000 acres after 15 years, Woodard said.

Perez said the San Benito area FSA plans to hold an informational meeting for landowners in May.

For more information on the conservation project, contact the Cameron County Farm Service Agency Service Center at 956-399-1311.

Environmental Waivers Could Doom Park’s Future

April 3, 2008

Environmental advocates said Wednesday that they weren’t surprised by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s decision this week to waive several environmental laws to expedite construction of border fencing in four states. Still, they haven’t given up on efforts to stop the project.

“I thought eventually, they would do this,” said Martin Hagne, manager of Valley Nature Center in Weslaco. “But I don’t feel we are defeated, and we’re certainly looking at every avenue possible.”

For months, environmental groups have spoken out against the proposed border fence, saying it would affect wildlife’s ability to migrate and reach fresh water from the Rio Grande.

Hidalgo County’s proposal to construct 22 miles of concrete levees that would double as a border fence rankled environmentalists even more.

Officials from the Rio Grande Valley’s wildlife refuges and environmental advocates said the combined fence-levee structure would make it impossible for endangered species like the ocelot to migrate.

Environmental groups likely will have a tough time finding an avenue to stop the proposal now, however. Under the 2005 Real ID Act, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has the authority to waive any laws that prevent quick construction of border fencing, including the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

That waiver leaves environmental groups with little legal recourse against the fence’s construction, said Oliver Bernstein, spokesman for the Sierra Club.

Last year, Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife filed a federal lawsuit challenging the construction of fencing on the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area in Arizona. A federal judge issued an injunction against construction in October that later became moot after Chertoff invoked his waiver authority, Bernstein said.

“Once that waiver was granted, construction started right up and we weren’t able to do anything else,” he said.

The two organizations have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the court to evaluate whether the Real ID Act is constitutional.

“We expect a response sometime this summer,” Bernstein said.

Chertoff’s announcement came after a March 3 letter from Kenneth Stansell, deputy director of the U.S. Department of the Interior, to Greg Gibbens, director of U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Secure Border Initiative. In the letter, Stansell says that any border fence or levee that cuts across the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge would ultimately violate the refuge’s purpose, and therefore Chertoff would have to waive the National Wildlife Refuge Administration Act to move forward on fence construction.

Stansell further warned that a proposed fence-levee combination in Hidalgo County would present more environmental problems than the original fence proposal.

“This combined project would eliminate wildlife passage by replacing CBP’s original ‘wildlife-friendly’ fence design with an impermeable 16- to 18-foot high wall built into a flood-control levee,” Stansell said in the letter.

Even with the waiver in place, the U.S. Department of the Interior is still working with the Department of Homeland Security on ways to minimize the fence’s environmental impact, said Department of the Interior spokesman Shane Wolfe.

The agencies are working on an agreement that would grant $50 million to the Department of the Interior to fund mitigation projects that would help endangered species, Wolfe said in a statement.

Environmental advocates said they are appealing to members of Congress to change the Real ID Act, and also are waiting to see what happens with the Supreme Court appeal and the November presidential elections.

“I think the public is starting to see that we have some valid points,” Hagne said. “I think this issue will gain national momentum.”

Refuge officials said, meanwhile, that they’re doing what they can to protect wildlife as fence plans move ahead - even if they feel their hands are tied.

“We’ve tried to figure out a way to make this a wildlife-friendly fence, but at the end of the day, it’s going to be a stretch,” said Nancy Brown, spokeswoman for the South Texas Refuge Complex.

Full Impact Of Border Fence May Not Be Known Before Construction

Filed under: Uncategorized, U.S. Security, Government, United States News — Administrator @ 3:44 am

http://www.brownsvilleherald.com/news/impact_85625___article.html/known_border.html

April 3, 2008

McALLEN, Texas (AP) - Rio Grande Valley elected officials and environmentalists wonder if they will know the full impact of the border fence before it is in their backyards now that the federal government has bypassed the law requiring detailed environmental study.

They waited months for a final environmental impact statement to be produced after extensive study of what lay in the fence’s path.

Now the U.S. Department of Homeland Security says those studies will go on, but it does not have to produce a final report.

Members of the Texas Border Coalition were told in a conference call with federal officials Wednesday that they will not get the final report on the fence. Homeland Security said it would instead work from a draft study.

Eagle Pass Mayor Chad Foster, chairman of the coalition, said they were told that some findings and mitigation studies would be made available to them, but not the comprehensive report required under the National Environmental Policy Act.

“What is it we don’t want to show the world,” Foster said. “That makes one suspicious.”

Congress has mandated that the Department of Homeland Security have 670 miles of fencing in place along the U.S.-Mexico border by the end of year to protect against terrorism and stem the tide of illegal immigration.

Last fall, the Department of Homeland Security released a massive draft environmental impact statement, with maps of possible fence routes and areas of environmental, historical and archaeological significance that would be studied in more detail for the final document. A public comment period followed when individuals, organizations and other government agencies submitted their concerns and suggestions for alternatives.

The National Environmental Policy Act was one of more than 30 laws Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced he was bypassing Tuesday.

The move away from an established process concerned border area officials and defenders of the environment.

“If you use this waiver and go around NEPA, and then claim you’re still going to do environmental studies, we would be wary of that because NEPA guarantees a process,” said Oliver Bernstein, spokesman for the Sierra Club in Texas. “They’ve kind of pulled the carpet out from under the community participation.”

In addition to detailing the fence’s impact, the final environmental impact statement was supposed to show that alternatives were explored, Bernstein said. “We may never know at this point.”

Amy Kudwa, a Homeland Security spokeswoman, said the agency had the draft environmental impact statement. “We will continue to work from that and will continue to move forward with environmental assessments.” Kudwa did not know what information would be made public or when.

In a statement released Tuesday, Chertoff said his agency “is neither compromising its commitment to responsible environmental stewardship nor its commitment to solicit and respond to the needs of state, local and tribal governments, other agencies of the federal government and local residents.”

McAllen Mayor Richard Cortez, who participated in the call, said, “They say one thing and then they back off it.”

Cortez was left with the impression that “they (Homeland Security) felt that they had done sufficient work, that there were no significant concerns out there and they could move forward.”

Federally-contracted archaeologists, wildlife experts and others have been conducting surveys along the fence’s path since late last year.

Cortez said, “I think we have a right to see what the data says.”

Under the Real ID Act, Congress gave Chertoff the authority to waive laws that impeded building the fence.

As of March 17, there were 309 miles of fencing in place. The waivers announced Tuesday cover about 470 miles of the border in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California.

Resistance to the border fence has been strongest in South Texas, where towns sit above the Rio Grande and families have strong ties on both sides of the border.

More than 50 Texas property owners have been sued by the government to allow surveying for the fence.

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress